OU researchers have produced new evidence which suggests that disadvantaged and vulnerable young people benefit from supported nature-focused activities.

Dr Jitka Vseteckova (Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies) and Dr Joanna Horne (Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences), are authors on a co-produced article titled: Ecotherapy and out-of-classroom learning for vulnerable and disadvantaged young people: an evaluation of a project in England, which has just been published in the journal, Environmental Education Research.
The paper is the result of a long-term inclusive research engagement and co-production between the OU and the Froglife Trust, funded by Esmée Fairbairn Foundation.
Benefits of ecotherapy versus pill prescribing
The OU researchers decided to undertake this research because they felt that research into the benefits of activities, which they call Ecotherapeutic out-of-classroom environmental education (EE) programmes, is limited.
Jenny Tse-Leon, Head of Conservation and Impact at the Froglife Trust and co-author on the paper said:
“We have been told in the past that there is a lack of hard evidence to demonstrate the impact of ecotherapy / participating in nature-based activities on the participants who take part.”
“Especially in the context of social prescribing where GPs would like data similar to that provided by pharmaceutical companies to demonstrate that rather than prescribing a pill once a day for six weeks patients could instead come on one of these sessions once a week and get the same benefits.”
Benefits of Green Pathways intervention

The OU researchers teamed up with Froglife to look at the impact of the Green Pathways programme, run by Froglife, on 111 young people, aged 10 to 25. The Green Pathways programme is designed to help young people take part in activities linked to wildlife and conservation in their local community.
The research compared young people participating in Green Pathways
to young people not participating, before and after the Green Pathways
intervention, on their preference for being outdoors and physically active,
their knowledge and appreciation of amphibians and reptiles, and their perceived capabilities (i.e. confidence, social skills, behaviour, positive outlook).
The research findings showed significant increases across all measures for those taking part in the programme, suggesting that programmes such as
Green Pathways substantively support vulnerable and disadvantaged
young people’s opportunities to enjoy nature and the associated benefits
to their health, wellbeing and life outcomes.
OU researcher, Dr Jo Horne said:
“As a result of participating in the Green Pathways programme, vulnerable and disadvantaged young people feel more confident and are better able to talk to other people and work in groups, are better able to manage their behaviour and are more positive about their futures.
“They also develop an appreciation for nature-based learning that extends beyond the programme itself.”

You may also be interested in:
- The full paper: Ecotherapy and out-of-classroom learning for vulnerable and disadvantaged young people: an evaluation of a project in England.
- More OU research in the Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies
- Esmée Fairbairn Foundation: esmeefairbairn.org.uk


Because nature is a powerful stress buster, it is a great ally for those battling stress and anxiety. A 2021 University of York study, for instance, showed that outdoor nature-based activities can improve mental health problems such as anxiety, as it leads to improved mood and more positive emotions. Gardening, exercise, nature walks, and simply spending time outdoors all weave their magic. The researchers stated that while all these activities are effective in themselves, it seems that doing them in groups leads to even bigger gains in mental health.
It is indisputable that spending time in green settings benefits mental health, but could formal “green prescriptions” from doctors undermine some of its benefits? The answer seems to be in the affirmative, as found in a study undertaken in 2020 by University of Exeter research. Their findings showed that although pressure from doctors to spend time outdoors could encourage more visits, it could also lessen the positive effects of green time. This means that healthcare professionals and loved ones should be sensitive and subtle when recommending time in nature for people with depression and anxiety. Specifically, they should encourage them to head to green places they already enjoy visiting, and highlight the fascinating benefits of green time, without making it seem like they “must” visit green areas. “Nature cannot be forced on anyone, but must be provided at the individual’s own pace and will,” said researcher, Matilda van del Bosch.